n this browser, the site may not be displayed correctly. We recommend that You install a more modern browser.

Chrome Safari Firefox Opera IE  
GORODISSKY & PARTNERS
PATENT AND TRADEMARK
ATTORNEYS IP LAWYERSsince 1959
pat@gorodissky.ru Ru En Jp
+7 495 937 6116/6109
contact us www.gorodissky.ru
 
print version

About us

Svetlana Kuzminskaya

Svetlana Kuzminskaya

Trademark Attorney
Ekaterinburg

Education

  • Ural State Mining University (1972-1977)
  • Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property (1979-1981)
  • Ural Federal University (2001-2002)
  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2003)

Experience

  • Mining machinery manufacturing science and research institution (Ekaterinburg) (1979-1982)
  • Central science and research laboratory of the Ministry of non-ferrous metallurgy (Sverdlovsk) (1982-1987)
  • Ural Manufacturing Enterprise Vector (1987-1990)
  • The Institute of Engineering Science, RAS (Ural Branch) (1990-1991)
  • Private practice (1991-2002)
  • JSC Energomash Uralelectrotyazhmash (2002-2013)
  • Gorodissky and Partners since 2013

Languages

  • Russian
  • English
  • Trademarks and service marks
  • Industrial designs
  • Inventions and utility models
  • Computer programs and data bases
  • Registration and cancellation of trademark legal protection

Presentations

  • “Means of individualization” (seminar “Trademark - effective tool of competition”, Ekaterinburg, April 2015)
  • Elaboration of application documents for a certificate of invention and patent research, including novelty examination of new equipment for mining and oil and gas industry.
  • Development of domestic regulations for companys inventions, utility models and industrial designs; remuneration payments for the authors; patent rights disposal.
  • Elaboration of paperwork procedures for the companys IP results recognition and accounting records maintenance of these results.
  • Consulting, patent search and analysis for a large regional furniture company. The documents were used in legal proceedings. As the result claim to the client has been rejected.
  • Consulting, search and IPRs analysis for one of Gazprom enterprises; providing recommendations on patenting of specific technical solutions.
  • Representation of a pipe fitting manufacturer in case of utility model protection; as a result, two judicial authorities made decisions in favor of the client.
Specialists
A B C D E F G I K L M N O P R S T V Y Z All