n this browser, the site may not be displayed correctly. We recommend that You install a more modern browser.

Chrome Safari Firefox Opera IE  
Меню
x
 
 
print version

Acquisition and use of the right to means of individualization in order to prevent the use of trademarks by unfair competitor

Client BAGI Professional Products Ltd. (Israel)

Description

The company BAGI Professional Products Ltd. (Israel) faced unethical practices of the former distributor of Chimlife, LLC (Russia), which registered in its name the trademarks «BAGI», «ШУМАНИТ», «ПОТХАН/POTCHAN». The Israeli company used this designation long before the priority date of the trademark. More specifically, the products of the client were supplied in large volumes to Russia, Ukraine, USA, Bulgaria, Georgia, Germany, France, Romania and other countries.

Solution

Throughout the work, several options were developed to resolve the situation in favor of the client, including the appeal to the Russian Federal Antimonopoly Service with the claim on the acquisition and use of the right to means of individualization by the unscrupulous competitor.

After studying the matter it was decided that there were prospects to challenge the trademarks in the Chamber of Patent Disputes (Rospatent) on the ground of non-compliance of the designations with the criteria of protectability, namely the possibility of misleading consumers with regard to the goods and their manufacturer.

In the meantime it was found that Best Klin, LLC (Russia), registered in its name the designation «BAMi», confusingly similar to the designation «BAGI», used by the client to label its products. Thereby, another objection against the registration of the said trademark was submitted to the Chamber of Patent Disputes.

Result

As a result of the proceedings, the legal protection of the trademark by the decision of Rospatent was invalidated in full; that permitted to the client successfully to register the trademarks in its name.

All the attempts of Chimlife, LLC, and Best Klin, LLC, to challenge the decision of Rospatent in the IP Court were not crowned with success, due to the high professionalism and coherence of the patent attorneys and lawyers of Gorodissky & Partners.

Back